Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
84% | 16% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
84% | 16% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 84% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 75% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Match O/U 21.5 | 65% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 65% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar | 60% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 58% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Set 1 Winner | 55% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Set 2 Winner | 55% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Match O/U 22.5 | 54% |
| Completed Match | 50% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Match O/U 23.5 | 49% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 43% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 35% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 35% |
| Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 33% |
Market context
Taylor Fritz’s meeting with Rafael Jodar in Washington is a straight final, so the market is mostly pricing a top-seeded ATP regular against a teenager who has already beaten higher-ranked opponents this week. Reuters reported Fritz reached the final by beating Brandon Nakashima 6-3, 3-6, 6-2, while TennisMajors said Jodar beat Alejandro Tabilo 6-7(5), 6-4, 6-4 to reach his first ATP 500 final and guarantee a top-20 rise regardless of the result.[4][11] That combination explains why the current crowd-implied **59%** on Fritz looks conservative rather than dominant: sportsbook prices cited by Sportskeeda were around Fritz **-135** and Jodar **+105**, which is broadly similar to a modest Fritz edge, while the prediction market is only a little further towards the favourite.[5]
Historical context points in the same direction. The head-to-head is **0-0** on TennisMajors’ match page, so there is no direct prior sample between them at tour level.[3] Comparable market set-ups on ATP finals usually weight experience, serve quality and ranking depth heavily, especially when the favourite has already played multiple tight matches that week; Flashscore’s match commentary noted Fritz has been below his best at times this season, but still considered him the stronger player on paper, while Last Word on Sports also tipped Fritz as more likely to win.[7][9] In practice, that leaves the contract sensitive to whether traders believe Jodar’s run reflects a genuine level jump or a short-term breakthrough.
The main catalysts are straightforward: final confirmation, any late scheduling change, and whether either player withdraws or the match is delayed beyond the seven-day window that would force a 50-50 settlement.[2] Reuters’ Saturday report and ATP scoring pages indicate the final was already on the docket, so the relevant risk is not whether the match exists, but whether it is played to completion as scheduled.[4][17] If the match starts cleanly, the price should track live hold/return dynamics rather than pre-match narrative, because Fritz’s serve advantage and Jodar’s momentum point in opposite directions and the market is already split close to a two-thirds favourite.
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Mubadala Citi DC Open: Taylor Fritz vs Rafael Jodar on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →