Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| First Blood in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 39.5 in Game 1? | 100% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 99% |
| Game Handicap: IG (-1.5) vs Weibo Gaming (+1.5) | 63% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 2? | 52% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 2? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 2? | 50% |
| Total Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 2? | 50% |
| Game 2 Winner | 37% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 37% |
| Match Winner | 17% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 1% |
| Game 1 Winner | 0% |
Market context
Weibo Gaming and Invictus Gaming are scheduled to contest a best-of-three League of Legends match within the LPL Group Nirvana format on 16 August 2026 at 05:00 ET. The settlement window closes at 16:00 ET the same day, allowing a six-hour window for match completion and resolution. The 0% implied probability on this contract reflects either extreme confidence in one outcome, sparse liquidity, or uncertainty about whether the match will proceed as scheduled.
Historical precedent in LPL scheduling suggests that matches in group-stage formats rarely cancel outright, though delays are not uncommon during tournament weeks. When comparing this market against typical sportsbook lines for LPL fixtures, the absence of meaningful odds divergence often signals either that the match is genuinely uncertain but illiquid, or that one team's superiority is so pronounced that casual traders have abandoned the contract. Invictus Gaming's recent form and roster stability would typically anchor expectations, though Weibo Gaming's mid-season trajectory matters significantly for fair-value assessment.
Traders should monitor official LPL schedule announcements and any team roster changes announced within 48 hours of the fixture. Technical delays—server issues, broadcast problems, or administrative holds—have occasionally pushed LPL matches beyond the seven-day grace period, triggering 50-50 resolutions. Injury reports or last-minute substitutions affecting either team's starting lineup would shift match dynamics materially. Cross-platform comparison shows limited activity on this specific pairing, suggesting that mainstream sportsbooks may not have published opening lines, leaving prediction markets as the primary price discovery mechanism.
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like PolyGram trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade LoL: Weibo Gaming vs Invictus Gaming (BO3) - LPL Gro… on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →