Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
93% | 7% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
93% | 7% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ shots | 93% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ shots | 72% |
| Harry Kane: 4+ shots | 55% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ shots | 51% |
| Armando González: 1+ shots | 50% |
| Armando González: 2+ shots | 50% |
| Armando González: 3+ shots | 50% |
| Armando González: 4+ shots | 50% |
| Armando González: 5+ shots | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 1+ shots | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 2+ shots | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 3+ shots | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 4+ shots | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 5+ shots | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ shots | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ shots | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ shots | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 4+ shots | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 5+ shots | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 1+ shots | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 2+ shots | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 3+ shots | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 4+ shots | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 5+ shots | 50% |
| Santiago Giménez: 1+ shots | 50% |
| Santiago Giménez: 2+ shots | 50% |
| Santiago Giménez: 3+ shots | 50% |
| Santiago Giménez: 4+ shots | 50% |
| Santiago Giménez: 5+ shots | 50% |
| Armando González: 1+ shots on target | 50% |
| Armando González: 2+ shots on target | 50% |
| Armando González: 3+ shots on target | 50% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 1+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 2+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 3+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ivan Toney: 4+ shots on target | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ shots on target | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ shots on target | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 1+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 2+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 3+ shots on target | 50% |
| Ollie Watkins: 4+ shots on target | 50% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ shots on target | 50% |
| Santiago Giménez: 1+ shots on target | 50% |
| Santiago Giménez: 2+ shots on target | 50% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Harry Kane: 4+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Julián Quiñones: 4+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Marcus Rashford: 4+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 4+ goals + assists | 50% |
| Santiago Giménez: 1+ goals | 49% |
| Santiago Giménez: 3+ shots on target | 49% |
| Jordan Pickford: 2+ saves | 49% |
| Raúl Rangel: 2+ saves | 49% |
| Raúl Rangel: 4+ saves | 49% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ shots | 48% |
| Raúl Rangel: 3+ saves | 48% |
| Raúl Rangel: 5+ saves | 48% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ shots on target | 47% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ shots on target | 47% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ shots | 45% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ shots | 43% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ shots on target | 41% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ goals | 39% |
| Harry Kane: 5+ shots | 39% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ shots | 38% |
| Jordan Pickford: 3+ saves | 38% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ shots on target | 35% |
| Jordan Pickford: 4+ saves | 33% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ shots | 31% |
| Harry Kane: 4+ shots on target | 31% |
| Jordan Pickford: 5+ saves | 30% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ goals | 27% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ shots on target | 27% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ shots on target | 27% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ shots | 26% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ goals | 25% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ shots on target | 20% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 4+ shots | 19% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ goals | 15% |
| Julián Quiñones: 4+ shots | 15% |
| Ivan Toney: 2+ goals | 13% |
| Ivan Toney: 3+ goals | 13% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ assists | 13% |
| Santiago Giménez: 2+ goals | 12% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ assists | 12% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ assists | 12% |
| Armando González: 1+ goals | 11% |
| Marcus Rashford: 1+ assists | 11% |
| Armando González: 2+ goals | 10% |
| Armando González: 3+ goals | 10% |
| Marcus Rashford: 2+ goals | 10% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 5+ shots | 10% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ goals | 9% |
| Marcus Rashford: 3+ goals | 9% |
| Julián Quiñones: 1+ assists | 8% |
| Ollie Watkins: 3+ goals | 7% |
| Julián Quiñones: 5+ shots | 7% |
| Ollie Watkins: 1+ goals | 6% |
| Ivan Toney: 1+ goals | 5% |
| Harry Kane: 1+ assists | 5% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 1+ assists | 4% |
| Julián Quiñones: 2+ goals | 3% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 2+ goals | 3% |
| Harry Kane: 3+ goals | 2% |
| Harry Kane: 2+ assists | 2% |
| Julián Quiñones: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Raúl Jiménez: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Santiago Giménez: 3+ goals | 1% |
| Ollie Watkins: 2+ goals | 0% |
Market context
The FIFA World Cup Round of 16 clash between Mexico and England, scheduled for 8:00 PM ET on 5 July, places a quarterfinal berth at stake in a tightly contested fixture. Current prediction-market implied probability sits at 8% YES for the player prop, while major sportsbooks diverge notably: Fox Sports lists Harry Kane at +150 for an anytime goal, whereas other analysts suggest the draw at halftime is the most likely outcome, with England to qualify priced at +120[1][2]. This 8% figure contrasts sharply with the consensus that the match will be low-scoring, with over/under lines set firmly at 2.5 goals and the under heavily favoured at -170[1][3].
Historically, World Cup Round of 16 matches between these nations have been defined by defensive resilience and extra-time drama; both sides are priced at 8-to-1 for a penalty-kick victory, reinforcing expectations of a 1-0, 2-0, or 1-1 result[5][6]. Traders should monitor pre-match squad announcements for England’s forward line, particularly Harry Kane’s fitness, as his absence would drastically alter the player prop’s value[1]. Yahoo Sports highlights environmental concerns impacting England’s performance but still expects goals, suggesting a potential over 2.5 outcome at +140[7]. The settlement window closes on 6 July 2026, meaning any late injury news before kick-off will be the primary catalyst for odds movement.
The divergence between the 8% prediction-market probability and sportsbook lines—where Kane’s goal is priced at +150 (implying roughly 40% chance)—signals a meaningful mispricing traders can exploit[1]. While analysts lean toward the under and a draw at halftime, the prediction market’s low probability may reflect overconfidence in England’s defensive solidity[2][6]. For a cross-platform comparison, Kalshi’s odds on similar player props often align closer to Fox Sports’ +150, whereas Polymarket’s 8% implies a far more cautious outlook, creating an arbitrage opportunity for those who trust the sportsbook consensus over the prediction-market outlier[1][2].
Methodology
This page reviews Mexico vs. England - Player Props across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Mexico vs. England - Player Props on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →