Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | 100% |
| Map 2 Winner | 100% |
| Match Winner | 100% |
| Map Handicap: AG (-1.5) vs JD Gaming (+1.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 19.5 | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 19.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 19.5 | 50% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 20.5 | 50% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: All Gamers (-2.5) vs JD Gaming (+2.5) | 50% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 22.5 | 50% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: All Gamers (-2.5) vs JD Gaming (+2.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: All Gamers (-2.5) vs JD Gaming (+2.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: All Gamers (-3.5) vs JD Gaming (+3.5) | 0% |
Market context
All Gamers are due to face JD Gaming in a best-of-three upper-bracket semifinal in VCT China Stage 2 Play-Ins, with the listed start time around 08:00 UTC and the contract set to resolve on the match outcome. The crowd-implied 100% yes price is materially more emphatic than the pre-match listings on esports trackers, where the fixture is simply marked upcoming rather than priced as a near-certainty; GosuGamers lists All Gamers at world rank 78 and JD Gaming at 90, which suggests a competitive, not one-sided, pairing[5].
Recent results point to JD Gaming arriving with some momentum but not overwhelming form. JD beat FunPlus Phoenix 2-1 in the play-ins, dropping the opener before closing the next two maps, and earlier lost 0-2 to Dragon Ranger Gaming in group-stage play[2][15][20]. That profile is closer to a modest edge than a lock: JD’s win over FPX shows they can recover mid-series, but their broader Stage 2 record has included losses to higher-placed opponents, which is why a 100% market price stands well above what the underlying form data alone would justify[2][15]. If cross-platform lines are available, traders should expect any sportsbook hold-adjusted price to sit much lower than the contract’s implied certainty.
The main catalysts to watch are simple but important: confirmation that the match actually begins on schedule, whether the bracket advances as planned, and whether any broadcast or venue delays affect completion before the seven-day settlement backstop. Liquipedia and tournament trackers place JD in the upper bracket of China Stage 2 and show this as a live play-ins match, so any late schedule change would matter more to settlement mechanics than to pure team quality[7][14]. If the series is played, JD’s recent 2-1 win pattern and All Gamers’ lack of a comparable visible Stage 2 result are the key comparison points; if it is postponed or abandoned, the contract’s 50-50 fallback becomes the relevant pricing reference rather than either team’s chance of winning[2][7].
Methodology
We track Valorant: All Gamers vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Stage 2 Play-Ins across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like PolyGram trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Valorant: All Gamers vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT China … on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →