Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
71% | 29% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
71% | 29% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 3.5 Games | 71% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 51% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 51% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 49% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 49% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 49% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 49% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 49% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 48% |
| Game Handicap: DNS (-1.5) vs T1 (+1.5) | 47% |
| Game 4 Winner | 46% |
| Game 2 Winner | 44% |
| Game 3 Winner | 44% |
| Game 1 Winner | 43% |
| Match Winner | 36% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 34% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-1.5) vs DN SOOPers (+1.5) | 23% |
| Game Handicap: DNS (-2.5) vs T1 (+2.5) | 23% |
| Game Handicap: T1 (-2.5) vs DN SOOPers (+2.5) | 12% |
Market context
T1 face DN SOOPers in a League of Legends KeSPA Cup semifinal on 17 August 2026, with the winner advancing to the final. The best-of-five match is scheduled for 5:00 AM ET, a timing that may affect viewership and liquidity across Western prediction markets. Current implied probability of 42% for T1 victory suggests meaningful uncertainty despite their historical dominance in Korean esports, though the crowd-sourced odds sit notably below the typical favouritism associated with T1 in major tournaments.
Historical context matters considerably here. T1 have won three League World Championships and remain the most decorated organisation in competitive League, yet KeSPA Cup outcomes have occasionally favoured regional challengers, particularly when meta shifts or roster changes create tactical mismatches. DN SOOPers' qualification to the semifinal indicates they have cleared a competitive field; Korean regional tournaments typically feature strong mid-tier teams capable of exploiting specific matchup advantages. The 42% probability reflects genuine competitive uncertainty rather than an outlier assessment.
Key variables for traders include roster confirmation and any last-minute schedule changes in the week preceding 17 August. Patch notes released before the tournament lock-in period will shape champion pools and early-game strategies. Monitor official KeSPA announcements for any postponement notices, which would trigger the 168-hour delay measurement from the original start time. Sportsbook lines in Asian markets, particularly South Korean operators, often move ahead of Western prediction markets on domestic esports; significant divergence between those lines and the current 42% should signal information asymmetry worth investigating before settlement.
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade LoL: T1 vs DN SOOPers (BO5) - KeSPA Cup Playoffs on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →