Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Game Handicap: GZ (-1.5) vs DetonatioN FocusMe (+1.5) | 100% |
| Game Handicap: GZ (-2.5) vs DetonatioN FocusMe (+2.5) | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 100% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 100% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 100% |
| First Blood in Game 2? | 100% |
| Game 4 Winner | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 50% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 50% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 50% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 50% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 50% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 50% |
| First Blood in Game 4? | 50% |
| Game 1 Winner | 0% |
| Game 2 Winner | 0% |
| Game 3 Winner | 0% |
| Match Winner | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay a Dragon | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| Both Teams Slay Baron Nashor | 0% |
| Both Teams Destroy Inhibitors | 0% |
| Any Player Quadra Kill | 0% |
| Any Player Penta Kill | 0% |
| Odd/Even Total Kills | 0% |
| First Blood in Game 1? | 0% |
| First Blood in Game 3? | 0% |
Market context
DetonatioN FocusMe face Ground Zero Gaming in a League of Legends Championship Series (LCP) Group Stage tiebreaker on 15 August 2026, with the match scheduled for 05:00 ET. The fixture will determine seeding or advancement within the group phase of the Japanese regional competition. A best-of-five format gives either side multiple opportunities to recover from early losses, though the extended series length also increases variance in outcome prediction compared to single-game markets.
The 0% implied probability on this contract reflects either extreme confidence in DetonatioN FocusMe's superiority or a liquidity constraint limiting market participation. Historical tiebreaker matches in regional League of Legends circuits show that seeding favourites win approximately 65–75% of such fixtures, though upset rates climb when teams have comparable recent form or when the lower-seeded side has roster advantages. Ground Zero Gaming's baseline win probability in a neutral BO5 against a stronger opponent typically ranges 20–35%, depending on recent head-to-head records and patch-specific meta alignment.
Traders should monitor roster announcements, scrim results leaking into community channels, and any schedule changes closer to the settlement window. The LCP's official broadcast schedule and team social media accounts will confirm final line-ups and potential substitutions. Patch notes released before 15 August could favour one team's champion pool or playstyle, materially shifting win conditions. Any postponement beyond 7 August without a rescheduled date triggers the 50-50 resolution clause, creating a discrete risk event independent of match outcome.
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like PolyGram trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade LoL: DetonatioN FocusMe vs Ground Zero Gaming (BO5) … on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →