Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 2 Winner | 0% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Giorgia Pedone’s ITF Women Chacabuco semi-final against Lucciana Pérez Alarcón was a live clay-court match, and the real-time score feeds show the contest had already started when the market snapshot was taken[1][9]. That matters for settlement because a match that begins but later stops without a winner is treated differently from a walkover or cancellation, so the market’s 100% YES price should be read as a live continuation rather than a pre-match view[18]. On the numbers, the crowd-implied probability is more extreme than the wider market picture: Robinhood’s prediction market showed Pérez Alarcón around 59¢ and Pedone around 42¢, while Tennis Explorer’s average bookmaker line was roughly 2.31 for Pedone and 1.55 for Pérez Alarcón, implying the Argentine had the shorter price with sportsbooks[7][18].
Comparable pricing for an ITF semi-final on clay usually follows recent form and draw context more than headline ranking. Here, the two players were separated by only a few ranking places in the live feeds, with Pedone around WTA 338 and Pérez Alarcón around WTA 341, which helps explain why sportsbook odds were relatively tight rather than lopsided[4][10]. Tennis Temple’s event page also listed Pedone as the higher seed in Chacabuco, but not by enough to force a one-sided market, and the H2H record was effectively even, reducing the case for a strong consensus edge either way[1][17].
The main catalysts traders should watch are the official scoreboard, any retirement or medical timeout news, and whether the match finishes inside the settlement window, since an abandonment after start can still resolve to 50-50 under the contract rules[18]. The listed start time on market pages had already passed, so any later delay, suspension, or scheduling change becomes relevant only if it prevents a winner being decided before the 7-day cutoff[5][18]. In practice, the biggest divergence to monitor is whether the live market continues to track the sportsbooks’ slight lean towards Pérez Alarcón, or whether in-play momentum shifts Pedone’s implied chance back towards parity[7][9][18].
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade ITF Chacabuco: Giorgia Pedone vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →