Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| New York City FC O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| New York City FC 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Club Necaxa O/U 0.5 | 99% |
| New York City FC O/U 1.5 | 66% |
| O/U 2.5 | 63% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 51% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 50% |
| New York City FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| New York City FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Club Necaxa 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 50% |
| Club Necaxa 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 50% |
| Club Necaxa O/U 1.5 | 43% |
| Club Necaxa O/U 2.5 | 26% |
| O/U 3.5 | 23% |
| New York City FC O/U 2.5 | 18% |
| New York City FC (-1.5) | 11% |
| O/U 4.5 | 6% |
| Club Necaxa (-1.5) | 3% |
| New York City FC (-2.5) | 2% |
| O/U 5.5 | 1% |
| New York City FC 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 1% |
| Club Necaxa 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 1% |
| Club Necaxa 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 1% |
| Club Necaxa (-2.5) | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
Market context
New York City FC’s Leagues Cup match with Club Necaxa is priced by the crowd at **23% YES**, which sits well below the main pre-match football market signals. ESPN’s listed match odds imply NYCFC were a clear favourite at around **-145**, while Sports Mole’s model made the home side **55.36%** to win and Necaxa **21.85%**; that leaves the prediction market noticeably more sceptical than both the sportsbook and the analyst consensus.[6][17] The game was scheduled for 13 August at 7:30 p.m. ET at Sports Illustrated Stadium in Harrison, and Leagues Cup’s official preview said NYCFC needed a regulation win and help elsewhere to keep quarter-final hopes alive, while Necaxa had already been eliminated.[10][13]
The historical frame is thin, because Leagues Cup listed this as the **first all-time competitive meeting** between the clubs, so traders have to lean more on comparable cross-confederation tournament spots than on direct head-to-head evidence.[10] That matters because the market is not just asking who wins, but whether a broader “more markets” contract clears its threshold, which often depends on goals, cards, corners or other secondary events rather than the result itself. NECaxa’s recent Leagues Cup record and form were mixed, while NYCFC’s tournament output was stronger, but Leagues Cup also noted that both of NYCFC’s goals in the competition had come from defenders, a sign of unusual scoring distribution rather than stable attacking production.[13]
The main catalysts are team selection, late injury news and the qualification matrix. Transfermarkt’s match report listed several NYCFC absences, including Maxi Moralez, Aiden O’Neill and Alonso Martínez, which matters if the contract is sensitive to attacking depth or set-piece quality.[12] Because the fixture was the final matchday of phase one, any rotation, live score effects from other group games, or changes to the line moves before kick-off could have more impact on this contract than on a simple 1X2 market.[13][19]
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like PolyGram trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade New York City FC vs. Club Necaxa - More Markets on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →