Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
70% | 30% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
70% | 30% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| CF América 2 - 1 Portland Timbers | 70% |
| Any Other Score | 50% |
| CF América 3 - 1 Portland Timbers | 21% |
| CF América 2 - 2 Portland Timbers | 12% |
| CF América 3 - 2 Portland Timbers | 7% |
| CF América 2 - 3 Portland Timbers | 4% |
| CF América 1 - 2 Portland Timbers | 3% |
| CF América 0 - 3 Portland Timbers | 2% |
| CF América 1 - 3 Portland Timbers | 2% |
| CF América 3 - 3 Portland Timbers | 2% |
| CF América 0 - 0 Portland Timbers | 1% |
| CF América 0 - 1 Portland Timbers | 1% |
| CF América 1 - 0 Portland Timbers | 1% |
| CF América 0 - 2 Portland Timbers | 1% |
| CF América 1 - 1 Portland Timbers | 1% |
| CF América 2 - 0 Portland Timbers | 1% |
| CF América 3 - 0 Portland Timbers | 1% |
Market context
CF América meet Portland Timbers in a Leagues Cup match whose **exact score** contract is priced by the crowd at just **1% YES**, implying the market is treating any listed scoreline as a longshot. That is consistent with how score-specific contracts behave in football: even when one side is favoured in the moneyline or 1X2 market, a single exact score carries a much lower probability than the result market, and the dominant alternative in these contracts is often “Any Other Score” rather than a named outcome. Flashscore and ESPN both have the fixture on the schedule for 9 August 2026, with the settlement convention excluding extra time and penalties, so regulation-time variance matters more than knockout progression narratives.[8][15]
Historical comparison points do not support a clean read-through from head-to-head alone. The teams have met only a handful of times, with América unbeaten in the recent sample and 2021 producing a 3-1 América win after a 1-1 draw in the earlier meeting, which shows the range has already included both a multi-goal home-type result and a stalemate.[1][10][16][19] That kind of mix is important for exact-score pricing: a modestly competitive matchup can still resolve to one of many scorelines, leaving each individual scoreline with very low implied odds even before you adjust for market efficiency. On comparable football score contracts, the analyst baseline is usually broader than the crowd price suggests, because the probability mass is spread across several plausible finals rather than concentrated on one result.
The main catalysts are lineup and availability updates, plus whether the tie is played on the published schedule and in regulation only. Form sites had América and Portland both entering the fixture without a long settled record in this competition cycle, so late team-news around rotation, travel, and tournament load can move the most likely score bands more than the match winner itself.[3][4][7] Traders should also watch for any official Leagues Cup or broadcaster changes to kick-off timing, since this market stays open if postponed and settles only on the completed 90-minute score, making schedule integrity a direct settlement issue rather than a background detail.
Methodology
This page reviews CF América vs. Portland Timbers - Exact Score across five venues. The live probability is the Polymarket mid-price, sourced directly from the on-chain Polygon order book; the comparison columns benchmark each venue on fee structure, KYC, settlement currency and payment rails. Every CTA routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
Trade CF América vs. Portland Timbers - Exact Score on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →