Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
78% | 22% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
78% | 22% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Michael Brennan | 78% |
| Beau Hossler | 17% |
| Benjamin James | 4% |
| Eric Cole | 2% |
| Sung-Jae Im | 2% |
| Tom Kim | 2% |
| Chris Kirk | 2% |
| Maverick McNealy | 2% |
| Zach Bauchou | 1% |
| Patrick Cantlay | 1% |
| Bud Cauley | 1% |
| Davis Chatfield | 1% |
| Trace Crowe | 1% |
| Joel Dahmen | 1% |
| Nicolas Echavarria | 1% |
| Alex Fitzpatrick | 1% |
| Harry Hall | 1% |
| Rico Hoey | 1% |
| Tom Hoge | 1% |
| Rasmus Hojgaard | 1% |
| Billy Horschel | 1% |
| Patton Kizzire | 1% |
| Brooks Koepka | 1% |
| Ben Kohles | 1% |
| Jackson Koivun | 1% |
| Hideki Matsuyama | 1% |
| Denny McCarthy | 1% |
| Matt McCarty | 1% |
| Alexander Noren | 1% |
| Andrew Novak | 1% |
| Thorbjorn Olesen | 1% |
| John Parry | 1% |
| Marco Penge | 1% |
| Chandler Phillips | 1% |
| Aaron Rai | 1% |
| Kihei Akina | 0% |
| Daniel Berger | 0% |
| Christiaan Bezuidenhout | 0% |
| Chandler Blanchet | 0% |
| Keegan Bradley | 0% |
| Blades Brown | 0% |
| Daniel Brown | 0% |
| Brian Campbell | 0% |
| Rafael Campos | 0% |
| Ricky Castillo | 0% |
| Luke Clanton | 0% |
| Tyler Collet | 0% |
| Pierceson Coody | 0% |
| Cam Davis | 0% |
| Jason Day | 0% |
| Ze-Cheng Dou | 0% |
| Adrien Dumont De Chassart | 0% |
| Nick Dunlap | 0% |
| Austin Eckroat | 0% |
| Harris English | 0% |
| A.J. Ewart | 0% |
| Tony Finau | 0% |
| Patrick Fishburn | 0% |
| Steven Fisk | 0% |
| Brice Garnett | 0% |
| Ryan Gerard | 0% |
| Doug Ghim | 0% |
| Lucas Glover | 0% |
| Max Greyserman | 0% |
| Ben Griffin | 0% |
| Emiliano Grillo | 0% |
| Brian Harman | 0% |
| Garrick Higgo | 0% |
| Joe Highsmith | 0% |
| Kensei Hirata | 0% |
| Ryo Hisatsune | 0% |
| Lee Hodges | 0% |
| Cooper Hrabak | 0% |
| Mark Hubbard | 0% |
| Mackenzie Hughes | 0% |
| Stephan Jaeger | 0% |
| Takumi Kanaya | 0% |
| Jeffrey Kang | 0% |
| Johnny Keefer | 0% |
| Michael Kim | 0% |
| Christo Lamprecht | 0% |
| Henry Lebioda | 0% |
| Hao-Tong Li | 0% |
| David Lipsky | 0% |
| Peter Malnati | 0% |
| Stefano Mazzoli | 0% |
| Max McGreevy | 0% |
| Mac Meissner | 0% |
| Keith Mitchell | 0% |
| Taylor Moore | 0% |
| William Mouw | 0% |
| Rasmus Neergaard-Petersen | 0% |
| Pontus Nyholm | 0% |
| Cheng Tsung Pan | 0% |
| Matthieu Pavon | 0% |
| Taylor Pendrith | 0% |
| JT Poston | 0% |
| Aldrich Potgieter | 0% |
| Seamus Power | 0% |
| Andrew Putnam | 0% |
| Player 0 | 0% |
| Player 1 | 0% |
| Player 2 | 0% |
| Player 3 | 0% |
| Player 4 | 0% |
| Player 5 | 0% |
| Player 6 | 0% |
| Player 7 | 0% |
| Player 8 | 0% |
| Player 9 | 0% |
| Player 10 | 0% |
| Player 11 | 0% |
| Player 12 | 0% |
| Player 13 | 0% |
| Player 14 | 0% |
| Player 15 | 0% |
| Player 16 | 0% |
| Player 17 | 0% |
| Player 18 | 0% |
| Player 19 | 0% |
| Other | 0% |
Market context
The Wyndham Championship is the PGA Tour’s regular-season finale at Sedgefield Country Club, and the 2026 edition has already been priced by bookmakers with Cameron Young among the shortest favourites at around 8-1 to 8.1-1, while other preview outlets have clustered the next tier around Jackson Koivun, Hideki Matsuyama, Ben Griffin and Justin Thomas.[2][11][17] That matters for this contract because a prediction market showing **0% YES** is effectively saying the winner has not yet been identified or priced as a live contract in the market structure, whereas sportsbook boards and analyst previews still imply a broad, competitive field rather than a near-certainty. CBS Sports also highlighted Young as the defending champion in its preview, which is unusual but important context because defending winners at Sedgefield tend to attract early attention when models lean on course fit and recent putting form.[2]
Historically, the Wyndham has produced lower-scoring, accuracy-driven contests on Sedgefield’s Bermudagrass greens, so the market is usually read less like a heavy favourite event and more like a short-list tournament where one hot week with the putter can decide it.[13] Recent previews have leaned on that logic: Golf Channel and CBS both pointed to a compact favourites group, while some betting write-ups gave slightly longer prices to players such as Justin Thomas or Sungjae Im, showing modest divergence between sportsbook lines and pundit consensus rather than a single dominant selection.[1][5][11] In that setting, a 0% YES price is not informative about the eventual winner; it mainly reflects that no listed player has been effectively assigned the win yet.
For traders, the main catalysts are the live leaderboard, withdrawals, and any weather shifts that alter scoring conditions. The PGA Tour’s own event notes flagged thunderstorms through Thursday to Saturday, with the heaviest rain chances in the afternoon, which can change tee-time equity and raise volatility if play is delayed or softened.[10] CBS and the PGA Tour both framed this as the final regular-season stop before the FedEx Cup Playoffs, so late-round position changes can also interact with bubble pressure and withdrawal risk, especially if a contender secures enough points early or is forced off the board by official tournament rules.[2][10]
Methodology
We track PGA Tour: Wyndham Championship Winner across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade PGA Tour: Wyndham Championship Winner on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →