Egypt vs. IR Iran - Exact Score

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The upcoming FIFA World Cup Group G match between Egypt and IR Iran, scheduled for 27 June 2026 at Seattle Stadium, pits Egypt’s clinical attacking edge against Iran’s legendary defensive resilience. With the crowd-implied probability for an exact score outcome sitting at 17% YES, traders are weighing whether this specific result aligns with the broader market odds, where Egypt holds a +140 moneyline advantage and the total goals line is set at 1.5[1][2].

Historically, World Cup group-stage encounters between nations with similar FIFA rankings often produce tight, low-scoring affairs; Iran has failed to progress from the group stage in all seven of their previous World Cup appearances, frequently conceding late or drawing 0-0[8]. Egypt’s recent head-to-head record against Iran shows two wins and one loss in the last five meetings, averaging 1.2 points per match, suggesting a pattern of narrow margins rather than goal-heavy blowouts[3]. This context frames the 17% probability as plausible but contingent on the match remaining within the 0-1 goal range typical of such tactical battles.

Traders should monitor final line-up announcements and any pre-match training updates, as Egypt’s squad has been visibly preparing with focused drills ahead of the fixture[5]. The referee, Szymon Marciniak, is known for strict disciplinary control, which could suppress early aggression and influence the goal count[6]. Recent reports confirm both teams are aiming for knockout progression, with Egypt needing victory to secure Group G top spot while Iran seeks a draw to reach the next phase[4]. Any shift in starting formations or injury news released before kick-off will be critical catalysts for recalibrating the exact score probability.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.