🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogView on Polymarket →

Dota 2: Ilbirs eSports vs No Hoodwink (BO3) - Asgard Championship Playoffs

Comparison of odds and platforms for "Dota 2: Ilbirs eSports vs No Hoodwink (BO3) - Asgard Championship Playoffs" — sourced live from the Polymarket order book, curated by PolyGram.

Game 1 Winner 100% O/U 2.5 Games 100% Any Player Ultra Kill 100% Ends in Daytime 100% Volume: $81K Liquidity: $26K Closes: 8 Aug 2026
Open live market →
Dota 2: Ilbirs eSports vs No Hoodwink (BO3) - Asgard Championship Playoffs

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
100% 0% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle View on Polymarket →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
100% 0% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain View on Polymarket →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD View on Polymarket →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR View on Polymarket →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) View on Polymarket →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Game 1 Winner100%
O/U 2.5 Games100%
Any Player Ultra Kill100%
Ends in Daytime100%
Game 2 Winner0%
Match Winner0%
Game Handicap: NH (-1.5) vs Ilbirs eSports (+1.5)0%
Ends in Daytime0%
Both Teams Beat Roshan0%
Both Teams Destroy Barracks0%
Any Player Rampage0%
Both Teams Beat Roshan0%
Both Teams Destroy Barracks0%
Any Player Ultra Kill0%
Any Player Rampage0%
Ends in Daytime0%
Both Teams Beat Roshan0%
Both Teams Destroy Barracks0%
Any Player Ultra Kill0%
Any Player Rampage0%

Market context

Ilbirs eSports are scheduled to face No Hoodwink in an Asgard Championship Playoffs best-of-three, and the market is already priced at a full **100% YES** for Ilbirs on the crowd side. That sits notably above the broader market picture: Polymarket’s contract showed Ilbirs around **70%** versus **31%** for No Hoodwink, while Kalshi was effectively the mirror image on the same live match, with No Hoodwink near **99%** and Ilbirs below **1%** after the series had started and reached a final 2-1 scoreline. The discrepancy matters because it suggests the current 100% crowd impression is not a balanced pre-match estimate but a hard consensus that may already incorporate live information, stale pricing, or a post-result state.

Comparable esports markets often stay heavily skewed when one team is favoured by community votes or model consensus, but they can move sharply once a live series begins, especially in best-of-three Dota where map one and draft quality can change the read quickly. Here, external sentiment was split: Strafe users were overwhelmingly on Ilbirs at **93%-100%**, while other model-based sites pointed to a narrower contest or even a No Hoodwink edge, and one odds page listed No Hoodwink as the stronger pre-match side at roughly **1.33–1.45** versus Ilbirs at **2.58–3.16**. That is the kind of cross-platform divergence traders usually watch more closely than the headline crowd number.

The main catalysts are straightforward: whether the series had already begun, whether the listed start time held, and whether the match completed inside the market’s seven-day settlement window. GosuGamers, Sofascore, Hawk Live and DLTV all recorded the fixture as played on 8 August, with GosuGamers showing a 1-2 finish and DLTV likewise reporting No Hoodwink as the winner, which is decisive for the contract if the result is final. If any platform listing were to be updated because of a replay, admin ruling, or cancellation, that would matter more than pre-match odds; otherwise, the settlement should follow the completed series rather than the original schedule.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Dota 2: Ilbirs eSports vs No Hoodwink (BO3) - Asgard Championship Playoffs across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?
Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
How does resolution work?
Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
How fast are USDC deposits?
Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Do I need to KYC for this market?
On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like PolyGram trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
How reliable are the quoted odds?
The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
and

Trade Dota 2: Ilbirs eSports vs No Hoodwink (BO3) - Asgard… on PolyGram

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →