🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogView on Polymarket →

Counter-Strike: ASTRAL vs Kreazion (BO3) - Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Group 1

Comparison of odds and platforms for "Counter-Strike: ASTRAL vs Kreazion (BO3) - Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Group 1" — sourced live from the Polymarket order book, curated by PolyGram.

Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.5 57% Map 1 Winner 51% Map 2 Winner 50% Match Winner 50% Volume: $86K Liquidity: $313K Closes: 8 Aug 2026
Open live market →
Counter-Strike: ASTRAL vs Kreazion (BO3) - Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Group 1

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick
polygram.ink (preferred broker)
57% 43% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle View on Polymarket →
Polymarket (direct)
polymarket.com
57% 43% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain View on Polymarket →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD View on Polymarket →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR View on Polymarket →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) View on Polymarket →

Outcome probabilities

Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.

OutcomeProbability
Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.557%
Map 1 Winner51%
Map 2 Winner50%
Match Winner50%
O/U 2.5 Games50%
Map Handicap: ASTR (-1.5) vs Kreazion (+1.5)50%
Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.526%
Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.526%

Market context

ASTRAL’s BO3 against Kreazion in the Esports World Cup Open Qualifier Group 1 has been priced as a clear but not overwhelming favourite across comparison sites, with market-makers in the 1.40–1.53 range for an ASTRAL win and a prediction-market contract sitting much closer to a coin flip at 50% YES. That gap matters: sportsbook-style prices imply ASTRAL are more likely to win than Kreazion, but the contract’s current pricing suggests traders are either discounting edge or assigning extra weight to schedule uncertainty and qualifier volatility. Recent matchup pages also show ASTRAL already being credited with a 2-0 result on some feeds, which is a reminder that live esports listings can update quickly and sometimes inconsistently across platforms.[1][2][13][14]

The historical frame is straightforward: in small open-qualifier fields, favourites often shorten sharply because BO3 formats reduce upset risk, yet market consensus can still swing on roster depth, map pool, and whether one side has already played earlier in the bracket. On BO3 preview pages, ASTRAL are repeatedly the side with the stronger outright-win probability, while Kreazion is priced more as a live map threat than a likely series winner, which is consistent with a moderate favourite rather than a dominant one.[2][3][4][11] Analyst-style picks lean in the same direction, with one recent preview calling ASTRAL the winner at 78% confidence, broadly closer to the sportsbook view than to the 50% contract level.[14]

Traders should watch for official bracket updates, start-time confirmations, and any rescheduling from the organiser, because the contract resolves to 50-50 if the match is cancelled, ends tied, or slips more than seven days beyond the scheduled date without a winner.[6][8][15] Cross-platform timing already differs by source, with the match listed at 15:00 UTC on some live pages and 18:00 on others, so the practical catalyst is whether the event feed and broadcast page stay aligned as the qualifier progresses.[6][8][9][15] Any late roster, server, or bracket notices from the Esports World Cup organiser would matter more here than in a standard league fixture, given the settlement rules and the compressed open-qualifier format.[6][8]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is PolyGram. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
Is this market available outside the US?
Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
How does resolution work?
Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
How fast are USDC deposits?
Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
How reliable are the quoted odds?
The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
and

Trade Counter-Strike: ASTRAL vs Kreazion (BO3) - Esports W… on PolyGram

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Open live market →