Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via PolyGram) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | View on Polymarket → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | View on Polymarket → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | View on Polymarket → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | View on Polymarket → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | View on Polymarket → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | 100% |
| Map 2 Winner | 100% |
| Match Winner | 100% |
| Map Handicap: ACE (-1.5) vs 6666 (+1.5) | 100% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-3.5) vs 6666 (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-3.5) vs 6666 (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-6.5) vs 6666 (+6.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-9.5) vs 6666 (+9.5) | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-3.5) vs 6666 (+3.5) | 50% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 1% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 1% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.5 | 1% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-9.5) vs 6666 (+9.5) | 1% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 1% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
Market context
Acend’s BO3 against 6666 in Stake Pulse Beat I Group C has been priced as a near-certainty on the crowd market, with the current implied probability at 100% for Acend. That sits broadly in line with sportsbook-style pricing available on match pages, where Acend is shown around 1.20-1.22 decimal and 6666 around 4.00-4.03, implying roughly an 81-83% win chance before margin rather than a true lock.[2][12] The gap between the exchange-style 100% crowd view and the bookmaker line suggests either a stale or thinly traded contract, or that traders are effectively pricing in a routine favourites’ win with little appetite for the underdog side.[2][5][12]
The historical frame is straightforward: both teams are mid-table by tournament ranking standards, with Acend listed around world rank 68 and 6666 around 109, and this is reported as their first recorded meeting.[4][5] That makes prior head-to-head form unavailable, so comparable evidence comes mainly from seeding and market pricing rather than matchup history. In similar small-group CS2 fixtures, the market often overstates certainty when a heavy favourite is already reflected across multiple price feeds, but the actual settlement still depends on the map score and whether the series is completed as scheduled.[2][3][5]
For traders, the key catalysts are operational rather than tactical: the official start time is listed at 10:00 UTC, and several live schedulers currently show the match either upcoming or already in progress, which raises the importance of checking whether the series has begun, been delayed, or moved relative to the settlement window.[1][4][7][9] Because the contract resolves to 50-50 if the match is cancelled, tied, or delayed more than seven days without a winner, any tournament schedule change, forfeiture, or bracket reshuffle is more relevant here than team news.[3][11] Early live-score updates from major esports trackers are therefore the main signal to watch, not analyst consensus alone.[1][4][9]
Methodology
We track Counter-Strike: Acend vs 6666 (BO3) - Stake Pulse Beat I Group C across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like PolyGram trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade Counter-Strike: Acend vs 6666 (BO3) - Stake Pulse Be… on PolyGram
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →